Mad Scientist, Calculated Killer, or Mentally Ill? The Aurora, Colorado Tragedy

How does one go from a PhD Candidate to one of the worst serial killers in American history? This was the question posed by Good Morning America anchor George Stephanopoulos when speaking about James Holmes, the 24-year-old neuroscience PhD student who went on a rampage in Aurora, Colorado killing 12 people and wounding another 58.

Video of an 18-year-old James Holmes taken 6 years ago at a science camp is in stark contrast to the video of him appearing in court for his initial arraignment. The slim, dark-haired teen whose dream was to own a Slurpee machine stands in stark contrast to the flame-red-haired 24-year-old who sat in court with wide eyes and a vacant stare. What makes a person go from one extreme to another?

The booby-trapped apartment designed to kill anyone who entered. The fact that almost no digital footprint of any kind was left behind by Internet searches. The costume, the firepower, the gas mask…what does it all mean? Is James Holmes a mad scientist? A calculated killer? Mentally ill?

While it is too early to know much of anything about James Holmes, his history indicates that he is an intelligent individual who has done well throughout his educational endeavors. Apparently, about four months ago he went on a shopping spree for guns and explosives and, at the beginning of June, wrote a letter to the school indicating that he was dropping out of school. What happened?

As a forensic psychologist, one of the first thoughts that comes to mind is whether this individual is suffering from some type of mental illness. Males who are prone to psychosis typically experience their first psychotic break between the ages of 18 and 24 so, theoretically at least, it is possible that James Holmes is experiencing some type of mental illness.

There are various mental illnesses that are common among mentally disordered offenders and Delusional Disorder is one of the first that comes to mind when thinking about the extreme lengths that Holmes appears to have gone through in booby-trapping his apartment and in planning and setting up the mass shooting.

Whether James Holmes would qualify for an insanity (criminal responsibility) defense or whether his lawyers will present an insanity defense are questions that many are asking and for which only time will tell but we will watch this case with interest and horror as it moves forward.

Images courtesy of nydailynews.com

Structured Professional Judgment in Sexual Offender Risk Assessment

icalforensicpsychology.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/images.jpg” alt=”" width=”120″ height=”180″ />

Dr. Doug Boer

The New Jersey Psychological Association is presenting an all-day Specialized Training on Structured Professional Judgment in Sexual Offender Risk Assessment by Doug Boer, PhD on Saturday October 20, 2012 from 9:00 am – 11:00 am and 1:30 pm – 3:30 pm at the Woodbridge Renaissance Hotel in Iselin, New Jersey, USA.

Program Description

Sexual offender risk assessment can be divided into two markedly different schools of thought and practice: the actuarial approach and structured professional judgement (SPJ). Actuarial tests, like life insurance tables, look at group data and provide a group-based risk estimate on shared historical commonalities with groups of recidivists. SPJ instruments, like the SVR-20, provide the clinician structure to their clinical and forensic risk assessment that dovetails meaningfully into risk management for treatment and supervision. This workshop will teach the use of the SVR-20, a structured clinical checklist designed for the risk assessment of sexual violence in sex offenders, and discuss the SVR-20 2nd edition. A new SPJ risk assessment tool, The Assessment of Risk and Manageability of Intellectually Disabled IndividuaLs who Offend – Sexually (ARMIDILO-S) will also be presented as the ID population requires unique considerations for risk management and intervention.

Presenter Bio

Dr. Boer is a world-leading expert in forensic psychology and correctional systems. He is the Vice President of the International Association for the Treatment of Sexual Offenders (IATSO) and Senior Editor of the well-received International Perspectives on the Assessment and Treatment of Sexual Offenders published by Wiley-Blackwell in 2011. He began working at the University of Waikato in January of 2006. Prior to 2006, he worked for the Correctional Service of Canada for 15 years in a variety of contexts. Amongst his numerous contributions, Dr. Boer co-authored the Sexual Violence Risk-20 (SVR-20) and the Assessment of Risk and Manageability of Intellectually Disabled Individuals who Offend – Sexually (ARMIDILO-S). These are two psychosexual risk assessment tools implementing a structured professional judgement method. Dr. Boer is the New Zealand editor of the journal Sexual Abuse: Australia, New Zealand and is on several other editorial boards, including the IATSO e-journal Sex Offender Treatment, The Journal of
Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, and the British Journal of Forensic Practice amongst others. Dr. Boer is also a Research Associate of the Institute of Sex Research and Forensic Psychiatry at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany, a Clinical Advisor to the KAOS programme at the Hospital Brøset, Trondheim, Norway, and a Visiting Professor in the Department of Psychiatry of the University of São Paulo, Brazil.

For more information or to register, please download the program brochure .

Violence Risk Assessment and Management for Post-Secondary Institutions – Concordia

cheap viagra super active

alt=”" width=”175″ height=”60″ />Violence in post-secondary institutions is a serious problem that has gained a great deal of attention over the last decade, partly as a consequence of tragic cases involving students, staff, faculty, and community members. Post-secondary institutions have made significant advances during this time to understand the nature of this problem and to establish teams to address this problem.

Randall Kropp and Kelly Watt, both internationally recognized threat assessment experts, will be hosting a 5-day workshop on violence risk assessment and management in conjunction with Concordia University College of Alberta in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada this coming June 18-22, 2012.

This workshop will provide an opportunity to learn new skills and build on existing skills in assessing and managing risk for violence in post-secondary institutions. Not only will participants learn about general principles underlying violence risk assessment and management, but also about best practices supported by researchers and practitioners around the world.

Why Attend?

Develop confidence and skills

Build your confidence when making decisions about cases that involve violence risk and develop you skills when communicating and collaborating with others about these cases.

Implement best practices

Learn about best practices in screening, assessing, and managing violence risk that will help you to prevent future harm and protect you from potential liability.

Network with others

Strengthen your relationships with other professionals with a shared interest in and responsibility for protecting public safety and preventing future harm within post-secondary institutions.

Who Should Attend?

This workshop is relevant for professionals within and outside of post-secondary institutions interested in assessing and managing violence risk including administration, human resources, faculty relations, resident life, legal, security, criminal justice, health care, and social services.

This workshop will be an excellent complement to other training offered in this area. Not only will it reinforce your knowledge in this area, but it will also provide you with the skills required to effectively and systematically assess and manage risk for violence.

Workshop Instructors

Dr. Randall Kropp and Dr. Kelly Watt are internationally recognized experts, prolific authors, and engaging presenters. Both are passionate about providing evidence-based understanding, knowledge and skills about violence risk assessment and management that professionals can apply in practice.

Dr. Randall Kropp

Dr. Randall Kropp works as a Threat Assessment Specialist at ProActive ReSolutions Inc. and as a clinical and forensic psychologist with the Forensic Psychiatric Services Commission. Dr. Kropp is an Adjunct Professor of Psychology and a member of the Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute at Simon Fraser University. He specializes in the assessment and management of violent offenders.

Dr. Kelly Watt

Dr. Kelly Watt works as a Threat Assessment Specialist at ProActive ReSolutions Inc., and is a member of the Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute at Simon Fraser University in Canada. Dr. Watt’s work focuses on conducting assessments, proving training, and developing strategies for workplaces related to preventing, assessing, and managing workplace violence. Dr. Watt is the author of over 70 articles, chapters, reports, and presentations and has conducted numerous workshops around the world related to violence risk assessment and management.

Workshop Overview

DAY 1 General Principles of Violence Risk Assessment and Management

  • Discuss general risk assessment and management principles
  • Apply general risk assessment and management principles to post-secondary Institutions
  • Learn essential knowledge and skills to conduct violence risk assessments and develop management plans

DAY 2 Assessing and Managing Risk for Intimate Partner Violence

  • Review the nature and causes of general violence
  • Discuss risk assessment and management procedures
  • Learn to administer the Historical-Clinical-Risk Management-20 (HCR-20)

DAY 3 Assessing and Managing Risk for Intimate Partner Violence

  • Review the literature on intimate partner violence
  • Discuss risk assessment and management procedures
  • Learn to administer Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide (SARA)

DAY 4 Assessing and Managing Risk for Stalking

  • Review the literature on stalking
  • Discuss risk assessment and management procedures
  • Learn to administer Guidelines for Stalking Assessment and Management (SAM)

DAY 5 Implementation of Violence Risk Assessment and Management Procedures

  • Learn about screening for violence risk

  • Discuss purpose, format, and content of written reports
  • Discuss issues related to establishing Threat Assessment Teams

Registration Details

Venue: Room HA017, Concordia University College of Alberta, 7128 Ada Blvd., Edmonton, AB T5B 4E4 Canada

Cost: $1250 (CAD) + HST per participant (until May 18); $1500 (CAD) + HST per participant (after May 18); $625 (CAD) + HST for graduate students in professional training programs. Groups who register five or more participants will receive free admission for every fifth person. Cost includes all materials (HCR-20, SARA, SAM manuals and worksheets). Light refreshments provided.

CE Credits: 30 (Note: Please click here for details on obtaining Continuing Education credits for this workshop)

 

Advanced Violence Threat Assessment and Risk Management Course

levitra without prescription

pg” alt=”" width=”175″ height=”60″ />Stephen D. Hart, Kelly Watt, and Keith Dormond, internationally recognized threat assessment experts, will be hosting a 4-day advanced course on threat assessment and risk management at the Westin Bayshore in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada April 2 – 5, 2012.

About the Course

The course will provide an opportunity for people who have basic or intermediate-level skills in threat assessment and management to develop and demonstrate mastery. The course will cover high-level skills such as case formulation, report writing, and expert testimony. Successful completion will be recognized with a certificate of competency.

This training event is being co-sponsored by the Canadian Association of Threat Assessment Professionals (CATAP).

Why Attend?

  • Take advantage of a rare educational opportunity

Many people have attended a workshop in threat assessment, but few have attended a high-level course that provides small-group instruction.

  • Make sure your expertise is recognized

Your employer, your clients, and the courts all want to know that not only did you attend training, you learned something at it. Individualized evaluation of your work allows us to offer a certificate of competency.

  • Strengthen your professional network

Meet others who specialize in threat assessment and learn from their experiences.

Who Should Attend?

This course is designed for professionals whose work involves threat assessment and management., including those working in criminal justice, security, health care, social service, education, and human resources settings. Attendees should have completed basic training (4 days or more) in threat assessment and management training, including the use of structured professional judgment guidelines (e.g. HCR-20, SARA, B-SAFER, SAM, SVR-20, RSVP).

Workshop Instructors

The workshop instructors are internationally recognized experts, prolific authors, and engaging presenters. They are passionate about providing evidence-based understanding, knowledge, and skills about violence risk assessment and management that professionals can apply in practice

Dr. Stephen Hart

Dr. Stephen Hart is a founding Director of ProActive ReSolutions, Inc., where he heads the Threat Assessment Stream. Dr. Hart is a Professor of Psychology and a member of the Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute at Simon Fraser University in Canada and also a Visiting Professor at the University of Bergen in Norway. His work focuses on clinical-forensic assessment in criminal and civil settings, and especially on the assessment of violence risk and the assessment of psychopathic personality disorder.

Dr. Hart is the recipient of numerous awards for his work in this area and is the author of more than 450 articles, chapters, books, and presentations, and has conducted more than 300 workshops around the world.

Dr. Kelly Watt

Dr. Kelly Watt works as a Threat Assessment Specialist at ProActive ReSolutions Inc., and is a member of the Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute at Simon Fraser University in Canada. Dr. Watt’s work focuses on conducting assessments, proving training, and developing strategies for workplaces related to preventing, assessing, and managing workplace violence. Dr. Watt is the author of over 70 articles, chapters, reports, and presentations and has conducted numerous workshops around the world related to violence risk assessment and management.

Keith Dormond

Keith Dormond works as a Threat Assessment Specialist at ProActive ReSolutions Inc. and is a past President and current Director of the Canadian Association of Threat Assessment Professionals. Keith has worked as a law enforcement officer for thirteen years and his work at Proactive focuses on conducting assessments, providing training, and developing strategies for workplaces related to preventing, assessing and managing workplace violence.

Workshop Overview

DAY 1 Advanced Principles of Violence Threat Assessment and Risk Management

  • Discuss advanced threat assessment and risk management principles
  • Review Case #1 and administer the HCR-20

DAY 2 Writing Short Reports

  • Discuss core components of report writing
  • Write short report based on Case #1
  • Review Case #2 and administer the SAM

DAY 3 Writing Long Reports

  • Write long report based on Case #2

DAY 4 Communicating Oral Reports and Conducting Expert Testimony

  • Discuss core components of risk communication
  • Practice oral report based on Case #2
  • Discuss general principles for conducting expert testimony
  • Practice expert testimony based on Case #2

Registration Details

Venue

The Westin Bayshore, Vancouver; 1601 Bayshore Drive, Vancouver, BC V6G 2V4; Tel# 604 682 3377, Fax# 604 687 3102

Cost

$1200 (CAD) + HST per participant (until March 1); $1400 (CAD) + HST per participant (after March 1); $1000 (CAD) + HST for CATAP Members. Groups who register four or more participants will receive free admission for every fourth person. Cost includes all materials (manuals and worksheets). Light refreshments provided

CE Credits

24 CE Credits (Note: Please click here for details on obtaining Continuing Education credits for this workshop)

Masters Degree Programs in Forensic Psychology

 

This article provides a review and summary of various graduate programs offering masters degrees in forensic psychology. There appears to be five fully online masters programs in forensic psychology and at least 13 different campus-based masters programs in forensic psychology. Each of these is reviewed and summarized to provide relevant information to those interested in pursuing graduate education in the field of forensic psychology.

Online Masters Degree in Forensic Psychology

Last year I reviewed and summarized five fully online masters programs in forensic psychology (four of which are based in the United States and one of which is based in the United Kingdom). Each of these programs appears to have its various strengths and weaknesses as well as differences in tuition costs.

For an easy comparison chart of these five programs, please click here.

For summaries and reviews of each of these programs, please click the relevant link below:

The Chicago School of Professional Psychology

University of North Dakota

Argosy University

Walden University

University of Liverpool

Campus-Based Master Degree in Forensic Psychology

Although there are a few programs where students can complete a Masters in Clinical Psychology or a Masters in Experimental Psychology with a concentration on psychology and law, there are also about thirteen programs that offer Masters Degrees in Forensic Psychology.

I have summarized each of these programs with respect to their program description, coursework, tuition, and whether or not a thesis and/or clinical practicum work is required or available as part of the program.

For a summary of the relevant program, please click the links below:

American International College

Arizona State University

The Chicago School of Professional Psychology

College of Saint Elizabeth

Fairleigh Dickinson University

Holy Names University

John Jay College of Criminal Justice

Marymount University

Massachusetts School of Professional Psychology

New York Law School

Roger Williams University

University of Denver

University of North Dakota

Career Profiles and Information

If you are already in a masters or doctoral program in forensic psychology or just want more information on careers in forensic psychology, check out the rest of this site as there are a bunch of articles on career opportunities in forensic psychology as well as a bunch of great career profiles prominent individuals in the forensic psychology arena. Enjoy!

Image courtesy of helpingpsychology.com

Master’s Degree in Forensic Psychology @ University of Denver

cialis order

width=”259″ height=”195″ />After having reviewed the five fully online masters programs in forensic psychology, numerous requests were received for more information on the campus-based masters programs in forensic psychology that are available. Thus, this series of articles will review each of the masters programs in forensic psychology and provide information on each program in a similar format so as to assist in comparisons between the various options

The goal of this series of articles is simply to provide information in a consistent format to assist those individuals who are considering an education in forensic psychology and not to convince anyone to attend a particular program. Having been a professor in this field for the last 13 years I am familiar at some level with almost every forensic psychology program available in North America. Many undergraduate students are not familiar with all the possible options and so this series will lay them out in a consistent format for ease of comparison.

Masters Degree in Forensic Psychology –University of Denver

Program Description

From the website: Our mission is to provide comprehensive education and training relevant to the application of psychological theory, knowledge, skills, and competencies to the civil and criminal justice systems.

The Master of Arts in forensic psychology was first offered at the GSPP in 1999 in response to the growing interest in the rapidly developing field of forensic psychology. The degree supplements fundamental master’s level clinical psychology training with course work and practicum experiences in the area of psychology and law. The Masters Degree in forensic psychology concerns the application of psychological theory, knowledge, skills and competencies to the civil and criminal justice systems. It is designed to train students to become mental health professionals, able to work in a variety of clinical settings within the criminal and civil legal system, including but not limited to: adult, juvenile and child populations; victim assistance; police consultation; correctional institutions; domestic violence and child abuse programs; and trial consulting.

Specializations

The Masters in Forensic Psychology is a clinically-oriented degree and students are expected to engage in practical application of their learned skills through field placements in a variety of forensic settings. No specializations, per se, exist in this program and all students are expected to take the same general sequence of coursework.

Credits

The program website does not appear to specify how many credits are required for this Masters program. It states that the degree is completed over a 2-year period.

Thesis

It does not appear that completing a thesis is an option in this program. The program was designed to prepare masters-level clinicians for work in a variety of forensic settings.

Externship/Practicum

Students are required to complete field placements as part of their clinical training. At least two field placements appear to be required.

Admission Requirements

A Bachelor’s degree is required for admission to the Masters program. If the student did not major in psychology as an undergraduate, 4 psychology courses are required (these are recommended: abnormal psychology, child psychology, experimental psychology, personality theory) as is a statistics course. This requirement can also be met by obtaining a score of 660 or higher on the Psychology Subject GRE.

All applicants must submit GRE scores. “The school expects an undergraduate grade point average (GPA) of at least 3.5 and a graduate GPA of 3.0. Higher scores may make an application more competitive.”

Tuition & Fees

The University of Denver has one of the most difficult websites to navigate and it is difficult to find straightforward answers to simple questions such as “How much is this degree going to cost me?” I was unable to find how many credit hours the Masters degree is comprised of but could ascertain that students were expected to attend the program for 2 full-time years, which appears to be 3 “quarters” a year. I was unable to find different rates for in-state and out-of-state residents so assume that the cost of a graduate education is the same for both (as it is at most other institutions).

In-State Residents

$12,312 per quarter (students attend three quarters in a calendar year) = $36, 936/year (the Masters degree is a 2-year program)

Out-of-State Residents

$12,312 per quarter (students attend three quarters in a calendar year) = $36, 936/year (the Masters degree is a 2-year program)

Coursework

Again, this was a difficult site to navigate and did not include a lot of specific information. The site includes a list of courses but does not contain any course numbers or credit hours. The courses are described and listed by year in the program.

Typical First-Year Courses

Professionalism and Practice I (First-Year Case Conference)

Introduction to Clinical Interviewing and Psychotherapy

Forensic Mental Health: The Basics (Forensic Psychology I)

Forensic Mental Health: The Front LinesLaw Enforcement and Correctional Psychology (Forensic Psychology II)

Forensic Mental Health: Risky Business (Forensic Psychology III)

Group Interventions

Statistics

Research Methods

Issues in Measurement

Adult Psychopathology and Diagnosis

Trauma and Crisis Intervention

Profiles in Crime: The Psychology of Criminal Behavior

Conflict Resolution in Forensic Practice and Real Life

Typical Second-Year Courses

Professionalism and Practice II (Second-Year Case Conference)

Ethical Issues in Forensic Psychology

Cognitive Assessment

Self Report Assessment

Projective Assessment

Sociocultural Issues in Forensic Psychology

Family Law

Mental Health Law

Evaluation and Treatment of the Juvenile Offender

Evaluation and Treatment of the Adult Offenders

Cognitive Behavioral Interventions

Substance Abuse: Theory and Treatment

Criminal Evaluations

Concluding Comments

The website for this program is perhaps one of the most difficult to navigate and therefore one of the least informative that I have seen. No specific answers to simple and important questions, such as “How much is this going to cost?” “How many courses am I required to take?” “What is the sequence of coursework?” or “How many credits do I need to earn?” were provided. Given that almost every other program in this area provides at least this information to prospective students, I wonder why this is not a priority for this particular program. If anyone from the University of Denver happens to read this post, please fill out the comments section below if you can provide me with some of the answers to these questions. If you are a student considering this program, I strongly advise you to contact the program director to find out the answers to these and other relevant questions.

What is clear is that this is a clinically oriented program that is intended to prepare students for work as masters-level clinicians and not necessarily for further study at the doctoral level. Students considering this program will want to inquire about whether the state in which they intend to reside licenses master’s level clinicians in psychology. Although the website indicates that 29% of their graduates go on to doctoral programs, I suspect that those individuals have sought out other opportunities for research while in the program. As the program is described, there does not appear to be a required research component.